"Virtual Groups" / "Dynamic Groups" (bigger, badder more better groups?)

Much of monday functionality is tied to groups. There is obvious utility in this construct. However, as other community members have pointed out in the past, there are times when the rigidity of the group implementation gets in the way. For example, it would sometimes be beneficial to be able to look at a board as though all items existed in a single “group”.

I believe that monday functionality would be greatly enhanced in this area by implementing two ideas:

  1. Provide a view level option to ignore groups. Simply, this would treat the entire board as though it has only one group.

  2. Provide “sort grouping”, “soft grouping”, “virtual groups”, or ???. From a user perspective, this could be as simple as allowing the user to specify a column to “group by” when defining a new sort. Once defined, the board would be displayed using “soft” groups in a fashion similar to the way the current groups work, i.e.: display format, summaries, ability to expand/collapse, etc. The group name could be something like: {field name}: value, e.g.: Priority: High.

The first of these ideas is relatively simple from both user and development perspectives.

The second, is a much bigger issue. I believe that adding the functionality as described above would provide SIGNIFICANT improvement to functionality and flexibility. This concept could be expanded greatly; But, you have to start somewhere.

I’m looking forward to seeing additional thoughts on this topic from the rest of the monday community.

This topic is tied tightly to sorting. For more thoughts on that, check out this post on Bigger, Badder, More Better Sorting

I have shared a similar idea to your second point called “dynamic groups” - much like your suggestion, this would allow the user to dynamically customise how content is grouped. The main difference here is that you have tied the dynamic grouping to the sort functionality whereas I have tied it to the saved views functionality. I see benefits in either approach! Would love to see something like this.

It’s all connected. In my mind, sorts/filters are functionally a sub-function of views. From that perspective, I think we are basically in agreement. Your description is a bit more wholistic.

By the way, I think I like your “dynamic groups” moniker better.